PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN TEORI KOLCABA: GENERAL COMFORT THEORY ASPEK DUKUNGAN KELUARGA PADA PASIEN LUKA KAKI DIABETIK
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Background: Improving the quality of life of patients with diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) is the purpose of nursing care. The family support is one of the important aspects that must be considered in patients with DFU, this is because of the family activity and relationship influence on physiological and quality of life. Unavailability of family assessment to DFU can affect in determining the appropriate diagnosis and intervention. The purpose of this research is to develop the family support in wound assessment instrument for patients with DFU.
Method: This research method was mixed method with sequential exploratory approach. There were 4 participants for qualitative methods and 73 respondents for quantitative methods. Validity test were by Pearson product moment with test retest approach, reliability test was by Cronbach alpha. Aiken’s V was used to Content validity index test for 2 experts.
Result: Four themes emerged from the qualitative methods for family support. 9 items measuring instrument obtained a valid (0,372-0,843 > 0,235) and reliable results (Cronbach alpha 0,959 and 0,976). Result of content validity index is valid by 0,67-0,83.
Conclusion: This study found 4 themes for family support, and the development of family support in wound assessment for diabetic foot ulcer patient that consist of 9 items is valid and reliable.
Key Word: Assessment, Diabetic Foot Ulcer, Family Supportt
ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang: Kualitas hidup penderita Luka Kaki Diabetik (LKD) merupakan salah satu tujuan asuhan keperawatan yang harus ditingkatkan. Dukungan keluarga merupakan salah satu aspek penting yang harus diperhatikan pada pasien dengan LKD, hal ini karena aktivitas keluarga dan hubungan berpengaruh pada fisiologis dan kualitas hidup. Tidak tersedianya penilaian keluarga terhadap pasien LKD dapat mempengaruhi penentuan diagnosis dan intervensi yang tepat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk Mengembangkan Instrumen Teori Kolcaba: General Comfort Theory Aspek Dukungan Keluarga pada Pasien LKD.
Metode: Metode penelitian ini adalah mix methode dengan pendekatan eksploratif sekuensial. Ada 4 partisipan untuk metode kualitatif dan 73 responden untuk metode kuantitatif. Uji validitas dilakukan menggunakan Pearson product moment, uji reliabilitas dilakukan dengan Cronbach alpha. Aiken V digunakan untuk uji indeks validitas isi pada 2 orang ahli.
Hasilnya: Empat tema muncul dari metode kualitatif untuk dukungan keluarga. 9 item alat ukur diperoleh hasil yang valid (0,372-0,843> 0,235) dan reliabel (Cronbach alpha 0,959 dan 0,976). Hasil indeks validitas isi valid sebesar 0,67-0,83.
Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini menemukan 4 tema untuk dukungan keluarga, dan pengembangan dukungan keluarga dalam penilaian luka untuk pasien penderita ulkus diabetes yang terdiri dari 9 item valid dan dapat diandalkan.
Kata Kunci: Pengkajian, Luka Kaki Diabetik, Dukungan Keluarga.
References
2. Firman, A. (2012). Kualitas Hidup Pasien Ulkus Diabetik Di Rumah Sakit Umum Daerah Serang. Tesis. Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta
3. Grant, W. (2013). Adults With Diabetes Who Perceived Family Members Behaviour as Unsupportive are Less Adherent to Their Medication Regimen.Evidance Based Nursing. Vol.16,No.1. 15-16
4. Gouin,J. (2012). The Impact of Psychological Stress on Wound Heaking: Methods and Mechanisms. NIH Public Access, 31(1): 81-93
5. Uchino, B.N. (2006). Social Support And Health: A Review Of Physiological Processes Potentially Underlying Links To Disesase Outcomes. Journal of Behaviour Medicine. Vol.2, No.4. pages 377-387
6. Creswell, J.W. (2016). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Mixed edisi Ketiga. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
7. Alligood, M. (2006). Nursing Theorist and Their Work, Eight edition, USA: Elsevier
8. Bomar, P.J. (2014). Promoting Health in Families: Applying Family Research And Theory To Nursing Practice. Saunders. Lippincott
9. Coffman, J. (2008). Family Support And Health: A Review Of Physiological Processes To Disesase Outcomes. Journal of Behaviour Medicine. Vol.4, No.1. pages 257-267
10. Chen. (2012). Health Behavior and Health education : Theory, Research and Practice Fourth Edition. United States America: John Wiley and Sons
11. Sarafino, E.P. (2015). Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Interaction. New York. John Wilky Inc.
12. Chaplin. E,S. (2010). Coping, Control, and Adjustment in Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. Vol.20.No.3. 208-216.
13. Teare, J. (2011). Using Quality of Life Assessment in Wound Care. Proquest Nursing & Allied Health Sources, Nursing Standart; Oct 2011; 17, 6: 59-68
14. Tao, H. (2011). Impact of Social Environmental Factors on Re-Hospitalization of Home Healthcare Elderly Patients. Proquest, Nursing Health Policy Program.
15. Sunaryo. (2014). Psikologi Untuk Keperawatan. Jakarta. EGC.
16. Tracey, P. (2010). Psychological Aspects of Wound Care: Implications For Clinical Practice. JCN. Vol.16, No.1. pages 23-38
17. Effendi, F. (2013). Keperawatan kesehatan Komunitas : Teori Dan Praktek Dalam Keperawatan. Jakarta. Salemba Medika.
18. Upton, D. (2014). Psychological Aspects of Wound Care: Implications For Clinical Practice. JCN. Vol.28, No.2. pages 52-57
19. Wound Healing Society. (2006). Guidelines for the best care of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Ragen.2006; 14:647-710. Pubmed
20. Schaper, N, C. (2012) Specific guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PAD in a patient with diabetes and ulceration of the foot 2011. Diabetes/Metabolism Research And Reviews. 2012; 28: 236–237.
